• SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    18 days ago

    Just sitting here waiting on the peeps who know more about stuff to chime in on this, cause it sounds awesome. But I’ve been burned before so I’m hesitant

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      18 days ago

      Seems solid.

      It doesn’t change a ton, but the point was basically them putting their money where their mouth is and saying “now we can’t sell out like everything else.”

      If you liked them before, this is great. It means google or whoever literally can’t buy them out, it’s not about the money. If you were iffy already because they’re not FOSS or whatever other reason, this doesn’t change that, either, for better or worse

      • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        What is this buying out talked about something not escapable if not some legal reorganization is made? It has been being talked about other companies, too, and it sounds like if you have a form of a company, you can’t legally refuse monetary offers from someone to buy your company.

        Is there such a legal mechanism that forces an owner to sell out if an offer is made, or is this more about proofing a company against CEO/shareholder personal sell out decision?

        • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 days ago

          A company with a public offering basically cannot refuse a large enough buyout because with a public offering comes a financial responsibility to the shareholders. Public stock is a contract saying give me money and I’ll do my best to make you money back, and it’s very legally binding.

          You can avoid this by never going public, but that also means you basically don’t get big investors for expanding what you can offer. A public offering involves losing some of your rights as owner for cash.

          When the legal goal becomes “money above all else”, it is hard to justify NOT selling all the data and violating the trust of your customers for money, customer loyalty has to be monetizable and also worth more.

          Proton has given a majority share to a nonprofit with a legal requirement to uphold the current values, not make money. This means that the remaining ownership can be sold to whoever, the only way anything gets done is if this foundation agrees. It prevents everything associated with a legal financial responsibility to make money, but still allows the business to do business things and make money, which seems to be proton’s founder’s belief, that the software should be sold to be sustainable.

          • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Thanks for the detailed explanation about publicly traded companies, but what I wonder is the privately owned ones being forced to sell out, if there is such a thing.

            For example, lets say Proton is owned by a few shareholders or just one, and it is not openly traded unless the shareholders make personal agreements to sell out or anything like that. If Google came with a truckload of cash and told these shareholders to sell their shares to Google, can they simply refuse the offer no matter how big is the pile of cash or the benefits of the offer, or do they have to find a legal reason to keep their shares? I mean, even the question sounds stupid and the answer should be “yeah you can just keep your share and run the company however you like, as long as you don’t go public listing”, but with all the concerns about the buyouts talked all around this last few years, the premise looks like it is hard to hold out.

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          I think a publicly traded company works that way as they have a fiduciary duty to the shareholders to make money, but the non-profit (controlling) part of proton has no such duty as their primary directive is their mission. They said I’m mostly talking out of my ass so I certainly could be wrong

    • sturlabragason@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      18 days ago

      Seems legit. Going towards a better business model. Don’t know if anything stops them going from non-profit to profit as OpenAI did buy at least their movinf the other way now with intent towards the opposite.

      I’ll keep using their service at least.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 days ago

        Don’t know if anything stops them going from non-profit to profit as OpenAI

        Don’t know about other countries but that’s illegal in the US and not what happened.

        Much like Mozilla and RPi, they have a for-profit and a non-profit arm.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Seems like all that will change is the fact that all profits made will be reinvested in the company, im not an expert though, so i may be wrong

      • lps@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        18 days ago

        Well that’s cool:). Remove the profit motive/surplus goes a long way to slow down evil.

      • Matt@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        Proton will still be a for-profit company that will be majority-controlled by a non-profit. The non-profit will not own all of the business either, so there will still be profits going to shareholders.

  • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    17 days ago

    In this world of enshittification and organizations becoming more and more aggressive, it’s so nice and refreshing to see proton doing the opposite and moving to a better model :)

      • Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I wish the forwarding with email aliases would function a bit differently. Right now the alias is set as the recipient in the email and I wish you could set the recipient email to whatever email you want (like one of the additional emails you can set in Proton Mail) because the way it is now it makes my general filters useless and I would have to add even more filters.

        Edit: I created a suggestions on their feedback site here: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/953584-proton-pass/suggestions/48496442-show-use-forwards-to-email-as-recipient-in-forwa if anyone cares to vote for it.

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          That’s a good point - voting for it!

          For my purposes I have a second proton email for things I may want to keep credentials for which I filter out, and the simple logins are almost always complete burners so I end up deleting half of them anyway. The moment I start getting unwanted spam I touch the simple login accounts and start making new ones.

          As someone with many hobbies I get things from all sorts of sites so it’s just kind of necessary if I don’t want to drown in spam lol

    • ballskicker@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      I upgraded mine but haven’t talked to the wife about including her yet because the family plan is for up to 6 so it’d be cheaper to just buy two individual subscriptions, she doesn’t really care enough to justify that much extra cost. Hopefully Proton adds another plan or two for groups!

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Same. I’m admittedly mostly a freeloader right now but this definitely will convince me to buy in.

  • zabi94@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I was this close to upgrade to the paid plan, and this is the final push I needed