• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thanks for this! The bullet ballot thing seemed odd but without any real access to information about actual counts I didn’t know what to think of it.

    Good to know it’s more than likely nonsense and we just really suck as a nation and did let Trump win legitimately. :/

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, he won through good old misinformation, propaganda, and blatant lies because his opposition can’t keep the successful message of hope and change going to engage apathetic voters like Obama did and would instead rather pal around with Liz Cheney and Netanyahu to try and peel away MAGA voters.

      While voter suppression and Republican election meddling is a real issue, our country sucking is the real underlying problem. We couldn’t even do a fucking thing about the insurrection four years ago.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yup. They had a hook with Walz and the ‘weird’ talking points. That seemed to really resonate with the Republicans and made them go out of their way to highlight out weird they were.

        Then they pivoted to try and win Republicans. And… they died.

        ‘Weird’ probably wouldn’t have won them the election or anything, but it was working. It could have been paired with good, short talking points about helping people, and Walz is a good enough, and genuine enough (or at least appears to be so) guy to really sell those talking points in a way that didn’t feel pandering or cynical.

        But they really wanted that right-wing vote. It’s like right-wingers telling the Democrats that they’ll never vote for them just makes the Dems want to win them over that much more.

        It’s wild.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          She could have said “medicare for all” once, instead of turning her back on the progressive left and she would have won.

          She could have said, “Gazan’s are human beings, and its important that all US allies receiving aid are in compliance with the Leahy law…” instead of turning her back on the anti-war left and Muslims and Arabs, and she would have won.

          She could have said “The efforts of 4 years of recovering from the pandemic were hard, but clearly we need to do better for US taxpayers who are still feeling economic hardship”, instead of spitting in the face of Americans by telling us the economy is great, when those Americans are having to put groceries back on the shelves because they simply can’t afford them.

          The campaign was a disaster. Harris was a turd in a punch bowl of a candidate and with even some basic, basic strategy she could have steered through the wickets. It was actually an easy election to win. At the turn of the tide Trump was almost as unpopular as Biden. She blew it at every possible turn.

          Lessons learned for the electorate: STOP FUCKING LISTENING TO MSNBC, CNN, NPR, ALL OF THEM!

      • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If anyone couldn’t see how Trump would be worse than Harris, that is honestly their fault. And now we are seeing the proof of that. It wasn’t a hypothetical, we already experienced Trump once, and we’re being proven right about him again. This isn’t a failing of the DNC to inform people of this, they screamed it at the top of their lungs. They said it during the debates. I was jazzed to vote Harris and keep that asshole away from office. But to enough people, things like that didn’t matter and they voted against their best interests, and now things are going to get substantially worse than if they voted Harris.

        If anyone couldn’t remember what life was like 4 years ago during the pandemic (and throughout Trump’s first presidency), that’s on them. I honestly can’t care about people’s issues with the DNC when we’re faced with an entirely worse option like Trump. The time for fighting to reform the DNC is during midterms where grassroots candidates can gain traction without threat of us losing it all. Allowing a much smaller volume of complaints about the DNC to take precedent over the tremendous evil Trump presents is a failing of the voters and is why we need the department of education more than ever. This is our brexit.

        Building back our institutions after this is going to be much more difficult than it is tearing them down. If Democrats win the next election, I wonder if they’re going to be blamed for not fixing things fast enough after their predecessor… Like, oh I dunno… The economy?

        https://www.epi.org/blog/the-trump-administration-was-ruining-the-pre-covid-19-19-economy-too-just-more-slowly/

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They said it during the debates. I was jazzed to vote Harris and keep that asshole away from office. But to enough people, things like that didn’t matter and they voted against their best interests, and now things are going to get substantially worse than if they voted Harris.

          I was excited up to and including the debate. Then everything she did after killed that excitement and I ended up voting for her and Walz only to vote against Trunp. Not because I wanted her in office, and I can see why people stopped caring.

          • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Trump was not more appealing than Harris at any time frame during this election cycle, and I don’t understand why people stopped caring, he’s the same person or worse compared to his last presidency. But they’re gonna care now, let me tell you. My only hope is that they mentally link the hurt Trump is going to bring with their lack of care during this past election, and learn from their mistake.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              It isn’t about Trump being more appealing. It is about being motivated to show up to vote. Harris killed that motivation, which is why voters for Dems turnout was so low.

              You don’t understand it because you are focused on her opponent, as was I. But Dems succeed when turnout is higher, and apparently stopping fascism by continuing the same mediocre Dem policies isn’t enough motivation.

              • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                apparently stopping fascism by continuing the same mediocre Dem policies isn’t enough motivation.

                I’ll take great Democratic policies that Trump will sadly now take credit for (IRA, chips, infrastructure, to name a few) over Trump any day.

                • snooggums@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  A better version of Social Security could exist instead of propping up the stock market with IRAs that are great for the middle class and suck for the poor is why IRAs are mediocre.

                  Dems barely make efforts on infrastructure. Yeah, biggest plin blah bkllah blah is still miles behind where it needs to be. Mediocre.

                  They failed to get single payer healthcare like first world countries because they wanted to keep the stupid filibuster that the Republicans will most likely ditch now that they have all three branches.

                  Dems still give handjobs to the police.

                  Not to mention Dems are also pretty shitty when it comes to international politics. They don’t start wars I guess, so there’s that.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          So many fucking people here desperate to absolve themselves of their idiotic decision to vote for Trump, a third party, or not at all. They desperately want to believe that Democrats would be just as bad, and that it’s the DNC’s fault that they chose to ignore the dozens of people who explained to them exactly why they were making a bad choice.

          Anything to avoid taking responsibility.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Hey, guess what: at least some of us folks who STFU during the campaign and voted for Harris, like good little Democrats, are capable of being honest about how they fucked up after the fact.

            Why aren’t you?

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        For me, I just wanna know the % of people who voted for him that weren’t swayed by misinformation but actually want all of what’s about to come. Those are the real people to worry about. I can get 1%, but what if it’s more like 10%…

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think a fair number of people voted for him because they thought higher tariffs and fewer immigrants would increase blue collar wages. Which is not necessarily wrong, but it ignores a lot of additional potentially catastrophic effects on the economy.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is the difference. Both the right and the left have their cranks, but the ones on the left never get mainstream acceptance. While on the right, they make the crank president.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because the left is, for the most part, intellectually honest enough to be skeptical of broad claims that seem too good to be true. Even ones that ostensibly benefit them.

      While the right just grabs hold with both hands at anything they read immediately and start plastering it all over social media.

      One side has the most basic critical thinking skills, and one side is lacking in that.

  • JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wanted it to be true so bad, and sure there were some illegal actions taken (Elmo), it’s not enough to overturn anything. It’s okay to feel defeated, but not to ignore facts. We lost.

    Side note, watch Veritasium’s video on “smarter people get this question wrong”, it talks about how your political position can blind your critical thinking skills and is important to remember. You can take nothing at face value, even your own thoughts.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The letter, which was spammed on Lemmy and deleted multiple times, just linked to other SubStack blogs as “evidence”. Come on, people

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was disappointed in the lack of critical thinking skills in those threads. I thought Lemmy users were smarter than that. Hopefully we can put all these conspiracies to bed.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        People are idiots everywhere.

        Everybody is an idiot sometimes.

        Even you.

        Not me tho. Thankfully I’m flawless and don’t have to deal with the same nonsense of ever being wrong.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s a sizable number of people intentionally looking the other way because they think they can fight fire with fire, utilizing the same conspiracy theory thinking that the Right routinely gets away to shape public discourse.

        I have to say, the thought crossed my mind. But Dems could never pull it off.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The claims made in a ‘duty to warn’ letter addressed to presidential nominee Kamala Harris are - according to our research - misleading.

      Sorry, but this is standard journalistic practice. The sentence is correct english, even in its unedited form, albeit in the same way that buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo is correct english.

      I do think it’s a practice that needs to be reconsidered in the interest of making journalism more accessible to everyone, but for now you just gotta learn how to read it.

      • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Have to disagree with you here. I’m not a journalist, but I read easily digestible headlines all day. I had to go back and carefully parse this sentence one word at a time. It’s just a bad headline.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So we upgraded from blaming minority voters to literally Trump’s own 2020 election mouthpiece lmao.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Perhaps people would choose something else if third parties had equal access and we changed how we vote to get rid of the spoiler effect.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    North Carolina

    Spoonamore alleged that the purported hacking and fraud in North Carolina proved to be “the most extreme” and that “the public results indicate over 350,000 voters cast a ballot for Trump and no other race.” However, this is false.

    According to the North Carolina State Board of Elections’ website, as of Nov. 21, 5,722,556 voters cast ballots. Of those, 5,699,152 ballots displayed votes in the race for president. The website also reported that 5,592,243 ballots bore votes for the state’s governor’s race. A comparison of the numbers for total votes and the gubernatorial race would reveal the maximum number of possible “bullet vote” ballots for all presidential candidates. The difference between the two numbers is 130,313 votes — a count nowhere near the 350,000 votes stated by Spoonamore. Trump received 183,048 more of North Carolinian’s votes than Harris.

    Welp.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not how this works folks. You are supposed to ignore all evidence to the contrary, then spend the next 4 years claiming the election was stolen and whining like a spoiled toddler

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like the folks who felt super justified in not voting are now obsessive on this. but. but. other people were supposed to get us the democrat against our will…

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      That is not my experience at all. I’m mostly seeing people the, “Harris ran a perfect campaign,” crowd buying in on this one.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        who is like ran a pefect campaign? no politician runs a perfect campaign any more than anything else is perfect in the world. It was fine relative to any other, but elections should not be determined by how well campaigns are run. If politicians put up a an accurate list of their accomplishments and platform online and participate in debates that should all that be needed for an electorate to vote in the modern age.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          who is like ran a pefect campaign?

          Joy Reid. She was very impressed that Queen Latifah endorsed her. It’s made her into a sort of a poster child for liberals who are delusional about the Democrats flaws.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            So your saying Joy Reid ran a PERFECT campaign. No flaws, no errors, of any kind. She is some kind of automaton or divine being. No one does anything perfect.

            • pjwestin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              …no. I’m saying Joy Reid, an MSNBC pundit, believes Kamala Harris ran a perfect campaign.

              • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Well yeah and all sorts of fox news pundits think trumps campaign and everything he does is perfect. Pundits gonna pundit (lie)