Joe Biden worries that the “extreme” US supreme court, dominated by rightwing justices, cannot be relied upon to uphold the rule of law.

“I worry,” the president told ProPublica in interview published on Sunday. “Because I know that if the other team, the Maga Republicans, win, they don’t want to uphold the rule of law.”

“Maga” is shorthand for “Make America great again”, Donald Trump’s campaign slogan. Trump faces 91 criminal charges and assorted civil threats but nonetheless dominates Republican polling for the nomination to face Biden in a presidential rematch next year.

In four years in the White House, Trump nominated and saw installed three conservative justices, tilting the court 6-3 to the right. That court has delivered significant victories for conservatives, including the removal of the right to abortion and major rulings on gun control, affirmative action and other issues.

The new court term, which starts on Tuesday, could see further such rulings on matters including government environmental and financial regulation.

  • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    To me, as a non-American, the most baffling thing is that everyone in the States just assumes, and accepts, that these appointed justices are going to rule according to some political bias.

    That’s not the way it works in the rest of the free world. Judges are, by definition, trusted to be impartial interpreters of the law/constitution. That’s their role.

    I live in Canada, and I’m vaguely familiar with some of the names of our Supreme Court justices, but I certainly don’t know their political leanings, nor do I care. Nor does any Canadian I know. That’s the way it’s supposed to be.

    So as far as I can see, the problem isn’t that SCOTUS is stacked with Republicans, nor that it can be. The problem is that everyone seems to assume that this is the way it should be.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, we don’t. Along with Citizens United, EVERY American with a brain and open eyes is aware these are the absolute most important problems, and they lead to endgame checkmate authoritarianism.

      • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet I never see any mention of this anywhere. Even here, it seems that Biden is more concerned about whether the court can administer justice because it is so much out of balance. No mention, though, that the “balance” shouldn’t even be a factor.

        SCOTUS justices are appointed for life because it’s supposed to put them above political considerations. No politician can influence them by threatening removal. Yet, there you are, SCOTUS is just as political as the other two branches.

      • natarey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And yet you’ve collectively allowed it to happen, and have taken no action to change the status quo.

        Sounds like Americans like their authoritarianism just fine.

        edit: Lotta Americans here angry they don’t know how to protest like a grown up country.

        These complains about “you just don’t understand our political system” are just you disempowering yourself and excusing your own inaction. If you actually cared about any of this you’d be out in the streets.

        That there are no mass protests. No major efforts to modify laws. No new candidates for political offices offering anything substantive. All while your life expectancy collapses, your birth rate falls off a cliff, your healthcare system continues to implode, and your wealthiest parasites make trouble for everyone without consequences.

        You don’t actually care about your problems if you aren’t willing to go outside to try to solve them.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t know what i hate more, being subjected to increasingly authoritarian christofascist rule in my country or having some punk looking down his nose at me and saying it’s my own fault.

          Pssssh.

          Tell you what. When it happens to you, why don’t you tell me what you hate more.

          (Fuggen punks think theyre fighting ready just cuz they’ve never been tested, geez almighty.)

            • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Victim blaming and undeserved arrogance come from the same type of folks, huh? The best (only good) part of interacting with these losers is the fact we’re on a public forum. At least then there are others to witness the interaction and see how dumb they look. I can only hope

          • blazeknave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh shit… love the ratm and/or the boss reference! Very different music, very similar representation :)

            • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s RATM and steinbeck, since the reference lead me to read the book and afterwards led me to many more truths. Thanks man! I am happy when people get the ref.

                • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh my God tortilla flat is fucking brilliant. I thought it trite in the first couple chapters but i stuck it out and was proven a fool. By the end i loved every one of those guys and now i need to read it again

                  • blazeknave@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You from upstate NY? Around 40 yrs old? Did you give me this book in college? Bc you sound like a certain guy I know… Lol

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              What do you think RATM would think about these “don’t criticize me for doing nothing” posts?

              • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Tom and zach would both be embarrassed for you.

                Firstly for your cowardly sock-puppetry, secondly for not knowing that those lyrics reference an important steinbeck character.

                But cone. You have one more, right? One more name you use to pump upboats in your silly existence? Hurry and bring that one out to be clever as well

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The irony of you calling someone cowardly. You didn’t name your account “Tom Joad”, you named it in reference to the song, which is explicitly a social protest song from people willing to actually do something rather than complain about being shamed. This isn’t quite Paul Ryan loving Rage while being the actual machine, but what a monumental lack of introspection.

                  “Where there’s a fight 'gainst the blood and hatred in the air, look for me, mom, I’ll be there.”

                  I don’t know what i hate more, being subjected to increasingly authoritarian christofascist rule in my country or having some punk looking down his nose at me and saying it’s my own fault.

                  Clearly Tom and Zach would echo this sentiment. Authoritarianism or someone looking down their nose at your inaction, who’s to say which is worse?

        • millie@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Americans largely haven’t had much of a choice. In states where the laws are decent and political corruption isn’t heavily entrenched, things are alright and the system isn’t totally broken. But in places where it has? There’s less and less ability to vote in more reasonable laws.

          The problems are systemic. The same states have shitty education systems, mass voter disenfranchisement of prisoners and anyone else they can justify taking the vote from, extensive gerrymandering, and every other form of corruption and political inefficiency. The major population centers take a very different approach, but they have to compete with these backward and broken states through an electoral system that skews the results in their favor.

          Trying to take direct action outside of the official political framework is also problematic. In Europe you’ve got the benefit of an extremely high population density and a relatively small area regardless of which country you’re in. In the US everything is extremely spread out. The result is that protest is often not terribly effective. You might be able to shut down a couple of streets, but there’s no way you’re disturbing commerce for more than a single metropolitan area (of which there are many) at a time. It’s the same reason mass public transit runs into issues: we’re way too spread out for strategies that require high and comparatively uniform population density.

          That doesn’t mean there’s no answer, but it does mean we’re going to have to get a little more creative.

          • blazeknave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            People take for granted what made Occupy special. We all rally around the fact that folks that normally wouldn’t recognize they’re all the 99% came together. But the real win was that it was everywhere all at once all the time.

            • millie@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right, but compare the effort to the results. People were bussing in from all over the country, but like what actually changed?

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Same thing with the BLM protests. The largest protest movement in American history and… nothing changed. COVID kills a million plus Americans and all that changed is OSHA was banned from enforcing worker safety measures. No extra disease tracking, no countrywide efforts to improve air quality. We’re stuck in a quagmire where leaders just wait out problems rather than needing to address them.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          No we definitely don’t enjoy this, it’s the same reason we all love to say “eat the rich” and “it’s guillotine time” and then do absofuckinglutley nothing about it. No one wants to be the one to start something absolutely crazy, we all deep down believe that we can somehow fix this within the system as opposed to throwing Molotovs. :/

        • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Largest protests in history (at least at the time) were against invading Iraq in the lead-up to the war. Democrats protest, but Republicans VOTE. That’s why they run everything from a minority position.

            • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So we’re going to protest our way around gerrymandering now?

              It’s gerrymandered because people voted in 6he reps who gerrymandered everything. Things didn’t get gerrymandered by the GOP protesting for more gerrymandering.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      First of all, the Overton Window in America is skewed heavily right. So our centrist Democratic leaders are center right, our Republicans are what most countries would call regressive, extremist, authoritarian right wing, or even fascists.

      See, the problem is rightwing extremism has been on a campaign since the civil rights era to take control of the country and undo the progress made since the 1960s.

      They installed right wing media. They cut education and tampered with curricula. They gerrymandered. They instituted voter suppression. Their strategy culminated in the Federalist Society influencing the selection of Gorsuch and installation of right wing judges during the Trump administration.

      The thing you have to know if you ever want to try and stop extremist, authoritarian, right wing regressives is that they do not hold the same ideals and morals as you and I. They do not play from the same playbook or follow the same rulebook.

      They believe that “might makes right,” that any ends justify the means, that rules are enacted to protect them and their in group and punish their selected out group. They believe in many cases that their cause is justified by God.

      And so any justice who adheres to such zealous principles will see no issue with finding a way to rule in the favor of their side. They may even go so far as to rule with weak or minimal justification. They will be a lot less likely to rule in an unbiased fashion.

      My current opinion is that, so far, we have only seen rulings that fall into the “finding a way” category.

      I think these justices will incrementally push the envelope on what they can get away with over the upcoming decades.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “I think these justices will incrementally push the envelope on what they can get away with over the upcoming decades.”

        I feel like we have already turned the corner of openly ruling along party lines as well as unrepentant corruption.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Agreed. I forgot to end my post with “but I fear that it can get so much worse before anything is done.”

            I mean, as crappy as the court has been and all the confidence they’ve lost, they have essentially just cemented the role of Supreme Court justice as a politician instead of some honored impartial high quality person who stays above it all.

            So they have blatantly pushed the Republican agenda, including things like Roe. But they could do so much more damage still.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I doubt the Republican justices stay alive for much longer with the growing realization that political assassinations easily solve issues with the supreme court. It’s talked in hush tones a lot online because people act as if talking about the thing means you’re inviting it.

        Tbh I’m genuinely surprised suicidal people on the left haven’t already taken one out. I was betting on it to happen shortly after Biden took presidency. It’s going to happen eventually if they keep ruling like shit. Revolutions are started by such political stunts.

        Although I used to think all the crazy school shooters were eventually going to be lefties as well. Turns out they at least try to get medicated and fix themselves. Righties just go out murdering for apeshit reasons lol. Still, I know way more people on the left in serious depression and wanting to commit suicide. With the amount of fame MSM gives suicidal murderers… like before, I’m surprised it hasn’t already happened.

      • jasory@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This patently false, compared to the world as a whole the US is quite liberal. Only in certain aspects, compared to certain European countries is the US “right-wing”. US for instance has way more liberal freedom of speech and religion than most countries. How many European countries have a state religion?

    • nl_the_shadow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not the way it works in the rest of the free world. Judges are, by definition, trusted to be impartial interpreters of the law/constitution. That’s their role.

      The problem is that these judges are appointed through a political process, as about any government worker apparently is. This way you get a hyper politicized country, where even the job of librarian is no longer just a job, but an oppointment that should be strictly controlled.

      It’s absolutely baffling.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes. The supreme court is a political tool just like every other branch of government.

      They are not impartial. They all have agendas.

      I think Canada may not have this issue because there aren’t as many different cultures in Canada competing for dominance.

      Even though your ruling class wants to extend its reach as much as possible, they acknowledge they’re still ruling over Canadians.

      In the US, it’s “city people ruling over country” or “whites ruling over blacks” or “christians ruling over everything.” This means it’s acceptable and even encouraged for one group to abuse another.

      This creates an “us vs. them” mentality because it really is us vs. them.