• GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          So did you not read the war time economy line above, or but understand it?

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ok so no.

              Obviously a country focused on military production can…produce militarily.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Military production accounts for like 6% of Russian GDP. Lives for vast majority of people living in Russia haven’t been affected by the war in any way. Maybe read up a bit of history of WW2 to see what focusing a country on military production actually looks like.

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah. Government-owned companies producing shells that probably wouldn’t pass QC in “the west”, and paying employees a pittance in comparison. Also at least based on aerial photos, Russians seem to use contact fuzes a lot (you can see the difference from the “splash” patterns) which are a lot cheaper than airburst / multifunction fuzes, but admittedly those might well have been old Soviet stock and their new production could well be more modern.

      Still, regardless of the fuze used it’s no surprise that Russian production is cheaper.

      • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Reportedly the Russian factory workers are being paid quite well. And the lack of quality is just a myth I think. There’s no indication that’s actually true.

        The real reason prices in the West are so high is that there’s a shortage, and shells are supplied overwhelmingly by private contractors, and so the price has multiplied thanks to supply-and-demand market logic.

        You may think the Efficient Free Market Knows Best™, so shouldn’t they increase production? Think again. They’re making record profits right now. Meaningfully increasing production involves building new factories for billions of dollars/euros, which might be ready in a year or two. By then the war will be over and they would have overcapacity, which would be inefficient and prices would plummet. Why would they do that to themselves?

        So they’re in a great negotiating position vis a vis desperate Western governments. They want guaranteed profits, of the same sort they’re making right now, or else the shortage continues.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        considering the rate at which UA is destroying russian tube arty I can’t imagine the fuzing will make much difference in the war.

        what an absolute shit show.

        • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not like literally all Russian artillery gets destroyed before firing off a single shot. Fuzing absolutely does make a difference