• Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Interesting. I am against the death penalty but even if the DNA comes back as not his, he is still eligible for the death penalty. Their debate is that the jury wouldn’t have given him the death penalty.

    It’s Texas; they would have given him the death penalty. It’s what they do down there.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Because that makes the state a serial killer. In fact, the state has murdered far more people than even the most prolific serial killer.

          Whether or not they are innocent is often an afterthought. A way too late afterthought.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago
          1. Why stoop to their level? We’re claiming to be better than a killer
          2. No take backs. One mistake is too many mistakes
          3. It’s actually cheaper to keep them alive
          • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Idk what’s the upside of killing rabid dogs? Most dogs are better than most humans, so how does the math work out there?

              • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Rabies and psychopathy are diseases. The prognosis is terminal in both cases, and death would be a mercy. Rabies is also far less harmful than psychopathy, because it results in less collateral damage. After all, psychopathy is responsible for almost every evil you can see in the world today from famine to poverty and war.

                Again, there is an argument against the death penalty but protecting psychopaths ain’t it.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  After all, psychopathy is responsible for almost every evil you can see in the world today from famine to poverty and war.

                  I don’t know, I think presuming you know the reasons and effects of things has led to some pretty harmful outcomes over the years.

                • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No they are not both diseases. psychopathy is not caused by infection or is it communicable. They have no basis for comparison. Also do you know anything at all about rabies progression? Its about the worst disease you can have if you have gone passed the point of no return to treat it.