• ech0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sr. Systems Admin here. IT does not give 2 shits about what you browse UNLESS something is reported or something trips our Alerts (has to be something major like Child Porn).

      We don’t sit there and actively monitor and watch what you are browsing. We investigate when something is reported by a worker or an Alert/Filter gets tripped

      HR also doesn’t know unless we tell them.

      • Ensign Rick@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Second. I once had a staff member come to me all embarrassed because someone sent a dick pick via some dating app while they was on our corporate wifi. I was like, “I promise we don’t care”.

      • ryeonwheat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but the it’s a good rule anyway, for some of the same reasons as the “Don’t put it in an email if you wouldn’t want it read aloud in a deposition” rule.

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably for audit/investigation reasons.

          IT generally doesn’t care (doesn’t want to care) but you still shouldn’t do personal stuff on work machines/profiles.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends on the company size and the people above IT. Sometimes the boss is a chode and demands everyone be supervised like children constantly.

    • teft@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also do some really weird things that are innocuous so the HR lady looks at you weird from now on.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everybody has a cell phone nowadays. There’s no excuse not to use your cell phone for private stuff. In fact don’t use the company Wi-Fi. You must use the company Wi-Fi then you must use a VPN

    But no excuse anymore not to use your phone, you don’t need to use the word computer to browse, send emails, flirt, whatever

  • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    They see and scan all traffic, even what doesn’t go through the browser.

    No one should use work laptops other than for work

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Until HR needs to dig up a reason to justify firing you.

        But my state is at will employment only, so they don’t need a reason.

  • PeachMan@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course they can, they literally own the machine. You don’t own it, so don’t treat it like it’s your own private job hunting platform or porn viewer.

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    your work sees all your browser history

    Possibly, if they’ve bothered to configure their machines that way. And only on the browsers they’ve configured that way and only on their machines.

    Also, please don’t assume that your work operates the same way as everyone else’s work.

    • Ecology8622@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We have that capability but dont really have the time or need for it. having said that, it only takes one rouge employee to mess it up for everyone else.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not on the IT team but have elevated permissions. I can dial into any of my subordinates computers “invisibility” I might add, and watch their screen. I can copy data remotely. It’ll take me a few minutes to grab an image of their computer “for backup” reasons, restore it on another computer, and then safely view their history.

      By invisibility, I still leave log traces on their computer.

      I’m not going to, because wtf. But I totally do have that power.

  • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work in cybersec - I’m not going to speak for all businesses or individuals but I will give you my perspective.

    Sometimes we need to see browser history to help with timeline correlation, it’s mainly to see “how did this file get here, was it downloaded etc.

    Sometimes the investigators need to check out the things they need to check out, BUT

    BUT

    It needs to be done precisely and sparingly where needed only. This means instead of going through the entire history file, or doing unrelated correlation work (spying on you without cause) you are going to only grab specific timeframes from things you suspect explicitly to prevent any overreach. It’s a tricky balance to hold but also why it’s so important for people in tech to be privacy advocates as well.

    There’s a difference between searching for answers to a problem that arose and looking for/predicting problems (thought crime detected!)

    • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I also work in cybersecurity. Second everything this person said.

      This thread is a good reminder, because at many organizations HR / management can and will look at your browser history (and computer activity in general) as a method of monitoring performance and staying in control.

      But at my organization, we have never once looked at anyone’s browser history (and I know that HR hasn’t because they would have to go through us). We certainly could if we were asked to and we would if there was an incident (what we would care about is sensitive / confidential information getting leaked or suspicious activity on the network using a specific person’s credentials, suggesting those credentials may be compromised). But in almost 2 years (we’re a startup in the aerospace electronics sector) we have never once had cause to do that and we have a philosophy that happy relaxed employees who feel trusted by their employer are the kinds of employees that we want, so we wouldn’t intrude that way without cause ever.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I third(?) this. Security and IT teams are too busy to be monitoring your everyday habits. Sure, they can see your history if they wanted to, but they won’t unless there is an appropriate justification to do so, and it’s usually triggered by an incident or HR. There also stricit rules with doing so because employees still have the right to their own privacy. It’s not like HR can just go over to the security guy and ask them to pull someone’s browsing history.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another Cybersec worker here, and I’ll broadly agree with all this. That said, I’d also point out that, depending on your site setup, the browser history may be nothing more than another place to correlate information we have from elsewhere.

      Several sites I have been at have used Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software which automagically records (and possibly blocks) data moving into and out of the environment. This can be very detailed, to the point of knowing when someone copy/pastes data to a web form. I’ve also been at sites which sniff web traffic at the firewall and record full pcaps and extract metadata for quick analysis. So yes, for those not aware, deleting browser history or using “in private” browsing or other steps to avoid us seeing your porn browsing, may not be as effective as you think.

      All that said, I’ve never been on a Cybersec team which has had enough time to really care about porn browsing, so long as you are not putting the network at risk. And, so long as HR/Management doesn’t tell us to care. We have better things to spend our time on.

      Lastly, if you don’t want us seeing it, don’t so it on a work computer. Look, we have lots of ways to see what you are doing. Just, do that stuff at home, on your own hardware. And leave the work computer for work. Writing up misuse reports is something I really hate doing.

    • _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same for our company, and all companies whose security folks I’ve had a chat with. We don’t give a fuck what you do on your computer. Almost all security folks are into privacy themselves, additionally to simply not having the time to look at people’s browser history or traffic or whatever.

      Yes, we have the option to collect data. No, we don’t look at it unless there is a very good reason to do so. And we protect that data, HR or whoever can’t just have it if they feel like taking a look. There is a process to protect the data, because that means protecting the company.

      Your security team is not the enemy.

  • seiryth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Forget chrome management. Any IT shop worth their salt is protecting their egress with a proxy, explicitly or transparently set.

    Don’t browse the net on your employer’s network or devices. Use your phone. Get on 4G/5G.

  • UsernameLost@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh no, my employer might find out I’m looking for other jobs after being overloaded for a year and a half and constantly having my concerns/feedback/process improvement initiatives brushed aside.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shot, i regularly browse jobs websites even though Im not looking to change jobs again soon. Just to keep them guessing.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have been hinting to my manager for 6-9 months that he needs to move part of my workload elsewhere so that I can focus and actually achieve something. To think, all it took was for me to tell him straight that I was unhappy and unfulfilled to the point that I was considering resigning. Suddenly he’s all apologies and let’s make changes because you’re kind of vital and we don’t want to lose you.

      • PopularUsername@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And I was fired for it. Depends on the market demand I suppose, some industries there is no denying your worth, in others you’re disposable.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love the fact that firing me what the person you’re answering mentioned is illegal here.

          Peace of mind.

          • PopularUsername@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah pretty outrageous, I soon found out employment rights in Ontario Canada are practically useless. I had no idea, I thought I had some basic protections, it’s almost nothing.

      • linoor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I remember correctly you have to pay extra to be able to access private messages. Maybe you didn’t have this option enabled?

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can see it. I know because someone had an HR investigation happening and they showed me screenshots of his Slack conversations.

        • library_napper@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it was a screenshot then they didn’t get it from slack. They have spyware that takes screenshots.

          Obviously if they install malware that records keystrokes or the screen then they can see what you type and what’s on your screen.

          But slack doesn’t let admins export private chats

          • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then they must have been able to capture his whole screen. Idk how they’d do that days later, but they had a screenshot of a private conversation in slack. Maybe he had already set off some flags before then and they were watching him or something.

    • GrappleHat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m on Ubuntu at work! The only employee on Linux at a tech company of >150 people! (Where are my Linux nerds?)

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Kind of yeah, the rest of the working world uses Windows for good reasons.

        • rog@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Legacy software with incredible backwards compatibility, exponetially more software options, user familiarity, pretty much everything that active directory provides from user management to group policies, the list goes on.

          Im a linux guy, but the thought of rolling out even the most user friendly linux distro gives me nightmares.

            • ryeonwheat@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Aren’t they? Changing a legacy app can take years to do the needed research, approval, procurement, and implementation. “Because my IT guy doesn’t like Windows” is a terrible reason to undergo that process.

              The same with retraining users on a whole new OS. You’ll spend hours over the course of months answering “where did my C:\ drive go?”. That’s a lot of time you’ll never get back.

              Active Directory provides a lot of tools that are familiar to senior techs and easy enough for junior techs to figure out. I might prefer how Salt Stack works but I don’t have time to train dozens of fellow techs.

              Linux is cool for a number of reasons, but it isn’t a magic easy button and a wise admin doesn’t swap out fundamental parts of his tech stack without careful consideration.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in a company that uses Microsoft stuff, but I use a lot of fedora and Linux mint in VMs. The latter is based off Ubuntu at least!

      It’s actually kind of nice to be able to save the state of my VM since forced restarts are so infrequent.

    • jayemecee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in the process of convincing my management to switch to Linux. The most important thing to them is having a way to remotely delete the pc in case it’s stolen. Does someone know of a solution in Linux for that?

  • angelsomething@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m an infrastructure analyst and at my workplace I implement such rules for specific reasons: 1) we need to be able to have evidence should an employee act maliciously with a company device. We do also monitor all queries but it’s passive. We can drill into your browsing history in great detail but won’t unless we have to (speaking personally here as I follow the code). 2) people will do dumb shit. And will lie to get support. Now, having been on the other end of a support ticket, I get it. Unless you lie a little, you may not get support promptly. Therefore, it’s part of my job to check what’s the lie and what’s the actual issue, which includes being able to see the download history. I would not be surprised if malware is accidentally downloaded and then it autonomously removes itself from the download history as It has happened before. Strictly speaking, this is done for both your safety as well as that of the company. And generally speaking, you should NEVER use your work laptop/phone/iPad for personal use because of all of the above.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I use my personal laptop at work, no issues. Employer can’t see what I’m doing which is the way it should be.

      If they don’t trust me, don’t hire me then.

      I would never work anywhere where people like you can watch what I’m doing. Luckily I’m in IT so I choose where I work.

      I despise companies who don’t give employees privacy. The reasons you gave means nothing. You can always argue for anything to protect the company. Who protects the employees?

      Safest for the company would be if you have employees in small cells being watched by guards around the clock. That would be really good for the company.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you’ve connected your personal laptop to your work wifi, they 100% can see all your browsing history (specifically whats passed through their network).

        Hell, I only run a simple homelab and I can see the exact traffic/browsing history of every device on my home network. I’m only tracking via dns traffic, but your https traffic can even be intercepted and decrypted pretty easily. So don’t even trust that.

        This doesn’t require installing anything on your device to fully monitor you.

        • angelsomething@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re not wrong. It really comes down to how ethical the IT/company is. And we are, purposely so. Also we have dns-over-https and No other identifier is parsed through. So we can see and block someone browsing porn on the guest Wi-Fi, but we’d never know who it was. Look, I’m not saying things are perfect, but there are people like me who look out for both the user and the company. The goal is ensure that users privacy is respected and that the company is protected agains misuse, malicious intent or just plain bad-luck. This is the “code” I was referring to. As IT people we have to behave ethically for business we operate in. It’s not perfect but nobody is trying to be. This is all best effort from all parties.

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Your ethics goes out the window when being told to do something by your employer.

            Maybe you try to look out for the user, but it’s completely wrong that employees should have to trust you to do that.

            “Company being protected from misuse” is a blanket term for survellience, same as “fighting terrorism”.

            I still stand by my opinion. Companies need to trust employees and not run survellience programs against them. It’s just wrong.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure but I work from home. Don’t use their wifi except when I’m in the office. I could connect to a VPN and they would also see a connection to a VPN, but I don’t care enough to do that.

          But when I’m at home, working on my computer, they don’t see anything.

  • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    if you don’t have your personal browsing using a private profile of a secondary browser which you know you can delete, you are doing it wrong.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      That might not be enough. I could monitor that on all the devices I manage, if I need to. There are tools to dump browsing info as it’s being committed, or it’s easy to pipe all the traffic from your machine through a VPN to a firewall I manage with a trusted cert injection into your device and inspect the traffic in transit. If you don’t want your employer to see what your up to, don’t use their infrastructure.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, yeah, if I worked at home I would use my personal computer for personal things and the workstation for work, it would be pristine. But alas, in the office there’s so much time I can spend pretending that I’m working because I finished my tasks before I implode.

        Some risks are necessary :)

        It’s not really about IT not knowing, but about being discreet enough that your boss doesn’t see your personal accounts logged in or even worse, to have two chrome profiles, both with obscure names, press the wrong one and to share the screen of saved tabs with Facebook, Instagram, pornhub… Yeah I’ve seen those bookmarks.

        It’s… Wtf… If you’re going to be that deranged, at the very least be discreet… Sigh.

        • rmuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some risks are necessary :)

          No, it’s zero-trust all the way down!

          not really about IT not knowing

          All true, and I’m sure your IT doesn’t care as long as you’re not taking stupid risks

          If you’re going to be that deranged, at the very least be discreet

          I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe… a folder full of photos of a sales rep’s feet taken under the table at a meeting… a bookmarked playlist of adult baby porn labelled “Potential Suppliers”… I watched a modded BitTorrent client try to fake VLAN tags for unrestricted Internet access. All those moments will be lost in time, like that expensive label printer from my locked desk drawer… time to get another coffee…

    • rog@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      As an IT administrator, if your org has GPOs controlling if you can delete your browsing history or not, there is no chance you will be able to install a second browser without admin credentials.

      • kaesaecracker@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I can confirm there are places where that is possible.

        Also as long as they do not whitelist executables, you could use a portable version of a browser.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And you would still get caught on the company device trusting company CAs, thus enabling them to decrypt all your traffic.

          Use a personal device on a personal network for personal stuff.

    • hypelightfly@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I can still see that activity. You’re still doing it wrong.

      Personal device not on corporate network or you’re doing it wrong.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure but people see that you are on the phone while the IT people don’t really care what you do and by bosses aren’t checking those logs so idc. it’s about being discreet on some layers.

        If I were at home I wouldn’t need to do anything to hide it since I would use my pc but since I’m in the office I have to get creative.

        Also, 5hisbpost was 7 days old :)