I can’t really think of a reason for that as Reddit is hated somewhat equally by “both” sides of the spectrum. It’s just something I find interesting.

    • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I had to look it up too. Apparently it’s an authoritarian leftist. Thinks state-socialism was a good thing. As while most leftists are more of the democratic, market, and anarchist varieties.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        State socialism is a good thing, what tankies promote is something else, they’re fascist that can’t accept that fact because it would mean having something in common with the fascists in the USA, a country that they hate so much that they’re ready to deny reality to have an anti USA opinion.

        • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m confused, and you seem to be a lot more familiar with the term. I read the wiki link that explains tankies. I don’t personally know any left leaning people who support Russia/Stalin/China regimes. Maybe because of my America-centric viewpoint and where things are today, but typically people who are economically left are also socially and politically left (equal opportunity is more important than individual freedoms), which is very anti-fascist. I’ve heard people say how great a true communism could be if it were possible, but no one’s ever made it past a dictatorship to get there.

          Are tankies people who are economically left but socially and politically right, and think someone has achieved a communist utopia without knowing anything about the corrupt oligarchies in Russia or CCP China?

          • RossoErcole@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The problem is not state socialism, it’s the authoritarian side of it. Tankies promote authoritarian views similar to fascists but with a different economics view (not even that different some times), hence they prefer the dictatorships like USSR (in these days even Putin, which is idiotic), North Korea, China; over what they perceive as imperialist, the USA (I agree on calling it imperialistic and disliking it, but not on considering it worse than dictatorships).

            I’m a communist which likes state socialism, but what is and was present in those dictatorship (ignoring the authoritarian side which I despise) is state capitalism.

            • escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              The problem is not state socialism, it’s the authoritarian side of it

              The communist utopia needs authoritarianism to work

              • RossoErcole@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not really, communism is about owning the produce of your work, that can be achieved in different ways, one for example (the main one) is by democratising the work place, which at the moment is run in a feudal and authoritarian manner. Where you work and your employer owns what you do, similar to how the feudal system would function.

                In this case communism would be more democratic than our current system.

          • Riskable@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The confusion comes from so much mass media that equates socialism with communism. They’re orthogonal concepts! Saying socialism is the same as communism is like saying beer-making is exactly the same as cheese-making. Anyone who understands what beer and cheese are would be like, “I’m sorry, what‽”

            The best way to think of socialism is that’s it’s a governance strategy that can be used wherever you want. Want everyone to pay taxes in order to fund and deliver government-run firefighting services? That’s socialism. Want to do the same with the military? Socialism. Whenever the government is delivering some good or service by way of taxpayer dollars that’s socialism.

            Capitalism and communism are economic systems. You can have socialist government constructs under either capitalism or communism. It’s just that communism doesn’t really have the flexibility to provide goods or services in any other way than via the government.

            Then there’s countries like China that claim to be communist (and the Right loves to call them that) but really, they’re more capitalist than communist. What they do have that most communists and fascist governments have is authoritarianism.

            That authoritarianism is what fascists and “tankies” have in common: Fascists support an authoritarian, pseudo-capitalist government while “tankies” support an authoritarian, pseudo-communist government.

          • Wollff@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            people who support Russia/Stalin/China regimes.

            Congratulations: That, and only that, is a tankie. It is a good practical defintion for the term.

            Are tankies people who are economically left but socially and politically right

            As I see it, tankies are just the same as the Trumpers. You can’t really say where they stand socially and politically, because they do not have a coherent opinion or ideology. Everyone who opposes their favorite regime is WRONG, and everything their favorite regime does is RIGHT. Bonus points for every action and opinion that hurts “woke lefties”, because the favorite regimes of tankies are all inevitably incompatible with progressive ideas and ideologies.

            without knowing anything about the corrupt oligarchies in Russia or CCP China?

            Imagine the answer a Trumper would give when you ask them if they don’t know about Trump’s corruption and character. The tankies answer just the same in response to allegations in regard to corruption and character of their favorite regimes:

            First of all, none of that is true, because the woke lefties, the media, and everyone are all corrupt, and lying. And what is true, is all a well played move of brilliant 5D chess which will save us all, because the supposed “corruption” is actually all part of a very smart and deliberate system of ploys and strategems which the woke lefties just don’t understand.

            Now, do the tankies and Trumpers truly believe that? Who knows. Doesn’t really matter anyway. What is clear is that both of those “ideologies” are dumb idiots.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re authoritarian. Not fascist. There is a difference. Even if both groups are more dedicated to authoritarianism than anything else. I would not be caught dead voluntarily anywhere with a fascist. While I disagree heavily with ML communist I might associate with them a little bit. But just never give them power.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think you understand how small of a global majority white European men are.

        • HotDogFingies@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d say most people are Chinese, but that’s not correct - a quarter of the world’s population is East Asian. This is the largest group in the world.

          So, I’d say that’s an odd quantifier that doesn’t really seem to have any support or credibility or relevance. Seems based on entirely nothing, actually. Further more, were that true or even possible, what’s your point?