Russia on Monday threatened to strike British military facilities and said it would hold drills simulating the use of battlefield nuclear weapons amid sharply rising tensions over comments by senior Western officials about possibly deeper involvement in the war in Ukraine.

After summoning the British ambassador to the Foreign Ministry, Moscow warned that Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory with U.K.-supplied weapons could bring retaliatory strikes against British military facilities and equipment on Ukrainian soil or elsewhere.

The remarks came on the eve of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inauguration to a fifth term in office and in a week when Moscow on Thursday will celebrate Victory Day, its most important secular holiday, marking its defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 months ago

    Russia on Monday threatened to strike British military facilities

    I’m going to go out on a limb and say that if the Kremlin isn’t happy with the current state of the war with Ukraine, that probably wouldn’t produce a situation more to their liking.

    • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      “You better watch out!!! We’re getting our military crushed, and if you join in we’ll get our military even more crushed by you!”

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’re already getting your ass kicked by Ukraine, you’re not scaring anyone with threats anymore.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We’re gonna need a community called “RussiaThreatens” like “ChinaWarns” where it just collects these stories. Yeah, we know.

      • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have complained to the chancellor about that and will continue to do so. But they do provide Taurus to allies who in turn send their stock of older but similarly capable systems to Ukraine such as storm shadow.

        Still, it’s silly and our weapons are only for defense against Russia anyway. We will only need Taurus ourselves if Ukraine loses. Might as well put them to use.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Russia has lost half a dozen ships to a nation with no navy. And they want to throw down with one as experienced as the UK? “Attacking the home of Storm Shadow missiles is a good thing” is the thought of an idiot.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Russian navy does not seem to have a defense against explody things in the water. It seems like an oversight, but I’m not a military strategist.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Russia on Monday threatened to strike British military facilities

    This is equivalent to USA threatening to strike North Korean, Iranian or Chinese facilities (all of whom have been arming Russia). No such threats have been made.

    Just so we’re clear who’s escalating things.

    • Shampiss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s just a media game

      Every time Russia says “there will be consequences” they’re just throwing threats around like a dog barking from the other side of a fence

      All their cards are on the table. The only things they could pull off are drafting more people or going nuclear

      They’re now scrambling to find soldiers from other nations because announcing another draft would obviously shake Putin’s control over Russia

      I just wish Europe would stop playing this war like a political game. SEIZE RUSSIAN MONEY! What are you afraid of? Ruining relations with Russia? Fuck off! Ukraine won’t have people to fight forever

      • cygon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So true. By this point, Russia is already using everything it can, short of an actual, hot war with the west. And their military is stretched to the limit already without that.

        I think this sabre rattling is still useful to them as a one-two-tactic:

        1. Public threat from Russia, mentioning but not directly threatening nukes (the “push” side)
        2. Russia-aligned media in the west publish articles saying “Putin’s threat should be taken seriously,” Russia-aligned western politicians smearing their opponents as “irresponsible war mongers”, followed by pushing for existing sanctions to be lifted, etc. (the “pull” side via stooges/crooked politicians)
      • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        SIEZE RUSSIAN MONEY!

        This is exactly what they should do. But they won’t, because most of it is held in the City of London’s offshore boltholes. Seizing anything from them would scare the shit out of every big-time capitalist and corrupt politician on the planet. Would be good for us though.

    • c10l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not equivalent. Russia is at war with Ukraine. The USA and the UK are, in theory, not a part of this war - at least not directly.

      It’s the equivalent of Ukraine threatening the countries arming Russia, if those countries decided to get more directly involved in the war.

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The USA gets up to a fuck ton of assbaggery around the world, but our involvement with what’s going on in the Ukraine isn’t among them.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It seems the Brits are doing something right, keep it going. Would love to see our chancellor doing the same instead of repeating the russian propaganda…

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d say that we’re frequently doing something right. Unfortunately, we’re also frequently doing other things wrong.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It genuinely baffles me how the conservative parties of more than a few western countries went from the hawkish party during the Cold War to Russian apologists today. The mental gymnastics are truly astounding.

      • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        What I like about this is that in order to appeal to right wing fascism the Tories must oppose the poster-boy for right wing fascism.

  • Enkrod@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s Russia gonna do? Lose on two fronts instead of just the one?

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    it would hold drills simulating the use of battlefield nuclear weapons

    Oh no, not drills. If we’re not careful they’re going to pretend to use nukes, that’s very scary.

    • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Ukraine invasion was preceded by drills/exercises close to the Ukraine border. It is a clear escalation, but I’d be surprised if they got more than first strike from it.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        They did that because they needed a reason for their forces to be near the border (Of course it wouldn’t fool a concussed chipmunk, but that’s not relevant). This is why historically Russian military exercises often get up NATO’s nose, because Russia does this a lot, it claims " training exercises" as an excuse for its forces to be in NATO waters.

        But simulating a nuclear strike doesn’t require forces to be in NATO territory or anywhere near the UK.

        It’s not the exercises itself that’s the problem, it’s the fact that Russia often uses them as justification for moving forces around.

        If Russia simulates a nuclear strike against London for example, how will anyone in London even notice. They’re just going to say they did it. It won’t actually involve doing anything.

        I’m going to nuke Moscow. Done.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “China’s final warning”

    I’d take it more seriously if the West actually became involved, but regardless of Frenchmen “shooting their mouth off” nobody’s sending troops to fight a nuclear power.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe double check to see if they actually still are one. All these decades of sabre rattling and corruption in the defense industry, wouldn’t it just take the cake if hardly any of their nuclear capabilities still worked?

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would say no-one is sending troops yet. I really dislike any country ruling it out entirely, better to just say nothing. If the conditions change, we (NATO/Europe) will need to act. Otherwise, our leaders may well be judged by the same yardstick as the leaders keen to appease a certain country in the late 30s.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I would tend to agree. But I think we definitely need to define a line in the sand now, not declare there is no line. Which seems to me to be what such statements say about us.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            The point is “the line in the sand” has been crossed multiple times without any reaction.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s something weird in Putin’s hand… it’s super blurry… I think he’s shaking it really, really fast… hang on, I have a high-speed camera. Let’s see what it is.

    Oh, well that makes sense. Pray, continue.