• peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    10 months ago

    A lot of them assuming you don’t get the required secondary powers.

    Super speed, if your perceptions aren’t heightened it rapidly becomes impractical, if they are things are going to get painfully boring real quick. Even thinking at double speed means you are going to be waiting for the world to catch up a lot. Never mind what even relatively low G-forces can do to someone.

    Super-hearing. Imagine if you really could hear conversations a block away, it can be hard enough discerning one conversation in a crowded room, imagine it being like that everywhere. All the rats and insects you will be hearing, the sound of people’s clothes rubbing together. Even if normally loud things aren’t deafening just focusing on one thing will be taxing.

    If you don’t get secondary powers then super strength is going to suck. The human body is already capable of injuring itself with its own strength. How many fastball pitchers get arm or shoulder injuries just from throwing something really fast, or power-lifters who have something break or burst. Modern sporting records are starting to push up against the structural limits of the human body.

    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Super-hearing. Imagine if you really could hear conversations a block away, it can be hard enough discerning one conversation in a crowded room, imagine it being like that everywhere. All the rats and insects you will be hearing, the sound of people’s clothes rubbing together. Even if normally loud things aren’t deafening just focusing on one thing will be taxing.

      Super hearing would essentially be tinnitus with some variety in the inescapable noise.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Also it would be similar to the experience a lot of autistic people have with their sense of hearing. Feeling overwhelmed by the background noise of every nearby animal, bit of noisy clothing, conversation, and heavy machinery is par for the course for me.

    • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the superhearing power is going to be different than you think. You can already hear your clothes rubbing against skin, the air conditioning blowing, etc. Your brain is pretty good at filtering those out. Now, the conversations will be more difficult, but think about your experiences at a party. Most of the time you can hear another group’s conversation if you listened and focused on them, but you can tune them out (most of the time, ignoring the cocktail party effect stuff for now). Unless you have focus issues already, it wouldn’t be a big deal. The issue would be the initial period where your brain has to learn what exactly to filter out. Right now, a rustle to my right would be a bad sign, and hearing a rat crawling through the wall would freak me out. After a few weeks though, I bet I’d have adjusted.

      • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I don’t mean my own clothes, (though I do quite often hear them). I mean everyone’s. I’ve also spent quite a bit of time living in a building where you could hear the rats moving about rather clearly (through a combination of a rat problem and some poor construction decisions.) Yes it goes from a ‘what was that?’ alert to a ‘oh it’s the rats’ but you still notice. It’s very different to continuous background noises like AC or traffic.

        Loving one’s life as if always at a loud party is exactly the thing I’m seeing as the problem. Yes you can actively focus on something specific, but always having to do that is going to be unpleasant. Never mind all the stuff you are going to overhear that you don’t want to overhear.

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, as someone with misophonia, I can’t imagine my hearing getting better than it is. Already I can’t tune stuff out, and it’s not just people talking. It’s ALL the lawn work in my neighborhood! It’s the bunny rustling leaves in my backyard from my bedroom. It’s the fan in the fridge that everyone else just blocks out. The gurgle of the fish tank. Lights make a high pitched noise, as do other electronics. That’s all before people. The amount of noises people make that others tune out is so much! Rubbing your fingers together. The spit in your mouth right before you speak. If I’m cuddling with you, the liquid squish your eyes make when you blink. The creaking and popping of your joints! Even just breathing is a loud constant. Most everyone else is filtering all this out, but it’s not something you can learn to time out. You either can or you can’t, and if you can’t you end up literally moving because your neighbor coughs too much and it wakes you up in the middle of the night.

      • griefreeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Seeing as the earth is constantly moving at 1600 km/h I feel like it would be incredibly difficult to actually open a portal on earth in the past or future

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think there is no situation where you gain super speed without extreme forces resistance, because if you exert the force to move at the speed of sound but aren’t resilient then your muscles, bones, and tendons will immediately shred themselves with that first step.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    10 months ago

    Super strength is something I could see being problematic.

    The movies always show the super strong hero picking up buses or trains with one hand, but in reality you have to lift such vehicles in specific places, or they will be damaged. Youtube is full of videos depicting cars falling from mechanic’s lifts due to improper lift point placement, or just old fasioned rust. Imagine Mr. Incredible going to pick up a bus in a state where the roads are salted, and just breaking off a handful of the frame.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is the kind of gritty reality I’d like to see in a movie. Stuff is constantly breaking when the hero tries to pick it up, he has to go through a montage of classes on structure and how to choose the best place to grab onto things.

      Also leverage. Unless the super strength comes with stability, lifing a boulder from the edge would just make the hero’s feet slip out from under them. He has to lift one side straight up until he can fit underneath to balance the thing. Then he has to hope that the ground below can withstand all the weight of the boulder pressing on the soles of his feet.

    • 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I never thought about that but you’re correct. You can mess up your car really bad if you put the carjack anywhere else than the strong parts of the frame.

    • Kage520@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Haha I’ve thought of that. Maybe they can add that to a Deadpool movie or something with a super strong character ripping up a car finding the lift points.

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup. Same with ‘slowing things down’ too quickly - sure you might save the bus but the strawberry jam inside isn’t going to appreciate it.

  • XTL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Any sort of super strength without added toughness and motor control. You’d break your own body let alone everything around you pretty fast. Same for juggernaut movement. Or high jump type flight.

    • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also, forget picking up buildings or planes. Most things would break or crumble under their own weight as soon as you tried to pick them up.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think that’s why I love that series. Each quirk has a consequence to it. One-for-all can store and unleash energy, but unless you use that stored power to reinforce the opposite forces, your bones will disintegrate

    • Shurimal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Forever War delved into the problems with super strength. The power armor took a humongous amount of training to be used finely enough in everyday tasks and not break something or someone. A simple handshake between someone in power armor and someone without could result in crushed bones or a ripped off arm. A great show of skill in using the power armor was the main character sitting down in office and writing a letter with pen and paper while wearing the armor!

      Another great example of how dangerous superstrength is when dealing with non-superstrength people was in anime Beastars where one big carnivore accidentally ripped off the arm of his smaller non-carnivore friend. In-lore was said to be a very common thing to the extent that limb reattachment is a common medical procedure.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I had always wanted my superpower to be flight obviously because flight is the shit. I went to my local theme park after the Batman ride opened. I can hear what you thinking Batman doesn’t fly. This particular coaster, they put you in laying down on your back, lock you in and then the bat wing flips you over. Every negative G turn, unless you’re gripping onto things with your hands, you just rag doll. Even if you could magically work out flight it would just be a constant painful workout trying to keep your limbs from looking stupid while you’re doing it.

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Being able to turn into metal/sand/water/bats/lettuce or whatever without additional magic would destroy the structure and state of your brain immediately.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think you guys are overthinking things too much. In a world in which some magical phenomenon can turn you into a lettuce, all of a sudden you draw the line at brain functions?

          • semi_sentient@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Maybe it works like caterpillar goop in the cocoon. It’s goop, and not exactly a caterpillar anymore, but experiments have shown that there’s at least some persistence of being, even after the former caterpillar-goop has become a butterfly. E.g. If you train a caterpillar to react to a specific stimuli with a negative response, the resultant butterfly will respond to the same stimuli in the same way that the caterpillar did.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Ability to stop time.

    As soon as you stop time, everything will go pitch black. The photons which refract off everything will be absorbed by your eyes instantaneously.

    Assuming you could still see, it would be freezing everywhere as the heat would dissipate the moment you touched it.

    Assuming you could still see, and wouldn’t freeze to death, if you were to unfreeze time, the human-shaped vacuum tube you created while walking from point A to B would collapse violently, killing you, and anyone else standing close to it.

    This also assumes that with time stopped, you can push microscopic particles around. If not, then any movement at all will make every molecule around you act as radiation, and and dust will feel like tiny razor blades, ripping through your body.

    Also, the ability to stop time doesn’t guarantee the ability to start it again.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also, the ability to stop time doesn’t guarantee the ability to start it again.

      That’s some Monkey’s Paw shit right here

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lack of light is something that does come up with the History Monks in Discworld. Although they only slow down time, so they can see things, just very dimly lit.

  • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Teleportation. Unless truly instantaneous, you need to account for the fact that the earth moves 18 miles per second relative to the sun.

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And isn’t the solar system moving at like 500000 miles an hour around the milkyway too?

      Teleportation and timetravel both have this issue where you have to take a fuckload of moving parts we don’t even completely understand yet, into account.

      • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Time travel would have to imply teleportation as well. If teleportation is actually instant or ftl, it would also be at least some level of time travel as you would be able to move outside your causal envelope.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why would you teleport relative to the sun or the center of the milky way? Wouldn’t it be easier to teleport relative to the nearest surface?

        • Endorkend@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The universe doesn’t care what you think is easier.

          It moves, you moving from one point in the universe to another needs to take into account where all the moving parts are going.

          Only instant teleportation, where nothing has had time to move, would work. But that would be akin to traveling back in time.

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            The Universe doesn’t give a damn about the Sun or the Milky Way, either, idiot. There is no defined central point for all coordinates. Everything is relative to something else or might as well be staying perfectly still for all intents and purposes.

    • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      On top of that you need to account for the fact that the earth’s surface is moving at different speeds depending on latitude and elevation. Even if you can do the calculations to hit your mark, there is most likely to be some energy mismatch that needs to be accounted for.

    • volodymyr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Inertial systems are all equal in a certain relevant here sense, if there is no need for account for your movement relative to Sun, Galaxy, CMB, or anything else. Yes, in this sense, Sun also rotates around Earth.

    • 56!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      This doesn’t make sense. The earth moves at very different speeds depending on what you compare it to. The only thing that makes sense is for the teleportation to be relative to the teleporter. Maybe it would still require taking into account rotation, instead of linear momentum. idk, still seems complicated.

      • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        But if it takes time, there’s a moment where you’re not there, and thus, the reference is lost.

        Instant teleporting no problems though. I would even be okay with nightcrawler/Minecraft nether-like teleport where you travel through another locked in dimension.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think this is really the only thing there is, without assuming there isn’t “complete control” over it. You either sacrifice total invisibility to be a floating pair of eyes (or at least 1), or you’re blind but totally invisible. Making it truly impractical even if you have full control over the ability.

    • bi_tux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It depends on what kind of “invisibility” you mean, if you’d be able to assume the temperature and texture of any material you’d be invisible but could still see. If you mean invisibility by breaking light you can’t really say, since we don’t yet know how we could use this to make a human body invisible, thereforce we don’t know the counter meassures yet

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        if you’d be able to assume the temperature and texture of any material you’d be invisible but could still see.

        That’s not invisibility just camouflage.

        Like, you can have the same texture as the wall you are standing in front of, but you’d still show up as a human-shaped piece of wall protruding out. Or if a bug was to crawl on the wall behind you, you’d block it’s view.

        • bi_tux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That depends on the angle you’re looking at it from but yes.

          But I don’t think we wouldn’t find any counter meassures if we happen to invent a perfect technology to turn invisible

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Assuming that the invisibility is based on a physical property. You could also be psychically invisible where you manipulate others minds so they don’t see you.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      There is a character in My Hero Academia that can phase through objects, but when he activates his power he can’t see or hear anything as a result.

  • x2XS2L0U@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    mind reading. it would make you super sad super fast, because you’d always know when you’re being lied to.

    • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I remember one of the tidbits I picked up from a psychology textbook was that people who were worse at knowing if their partner was lying were in happier relationships. Turns out that white lies are important.

  • kryllic@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Immortality. If you go to the bottom of the ocean or space without protection your muscles won’t get any more oxygen and you’ll get rigor mortis and basically be stuck forever.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Super speed. Either you would need to also think and react at super speeds, which mean the world would be agonizingly slow, or you would have normal speed reaction in which case you would crash and die.

    There is also the option of super reaction time on demand, but in any case non of this matters as super speed would make the air as “thick” as a concrete wall so you would also need to me super strong and super durable.

    • bi_tux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      This might not be a problem, since you could regulate how fast you run, in which case you could run as fast as a car which wouldn’t necessarily require other super stats

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Not sure why it has to be. Being a superpower, it already defies logic. Why is it necessarily painful? I don’t see why the brain can’t temporarily shut off pain receptors if it’s already doing something fantastical.

      I’m reminded of the Animorphs books, where they describe the process as grotesque and the odd sensations they feel.

    • humdrumgentleman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The Animorphs series explores this quite well. It’s not actually painful for them, but should be and is plenty disturbing.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Only the first time. Then just leave out the nervous system going forward?

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    x ray vision, pretty sure you need to expose things to x rays to see skeletons. You gonna walk around irradiating people with an x ray source?

    • Kage520@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Eh I don’t think this is meant to say it’s actually x-rays. Wouldn’t that require a receiving end on the other side of the person?

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sort of. You don’t really see things on x-rays, you see shadows created by denser material.

      Projecting X-rays at your target wouldn’t be very useful, as they are usually absorbed rather than reflected back (I think). You’d be able to see if somehow the subject got between you and a significant source of x-rays

    • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or your like the Red Rush and experience EVERYTHING in super speed. Normal conversations will take weeks from your perspective

      • liztliss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think in that case I’d just ask them to write it down and I’ll come read it and write a response when they’re done, then could go do something else in that time- I guess it’s like my life now… text me or what you said doesn’t exist… 😆😩