• Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      123
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      This isn’t inflation. This is greed. Record profits with soul crushing wages. Governments that allow this are complicit. We need heavy windfall taxes

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        65
        ·
        10 months ago

        Windfall taxes are reactive and bad policy in general.

        What we need is a return to pre-Reagan tax policy. Higher upper tax brackets, corporate taxes, and the closing of loopholes that allow the rich to hide their wealth offshore.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        60
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        saying “greed” in the context of capitalism makes no sense. the word doesn’t have meaning because the system is morally agnostic.

        edit: its a headless system optimized for profit accumulation as its sole parameter. there’s no systemic incentive for anyone to behave otherwise.

        • VenoraTheBarbarian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          10 months ago

          What word do you prefer to use to describe people who hoard more wealth than they or their children can spend in a lifetime while the vast majority of workers are on the edge of financial ruin? Why can’t they be satisfied with just having one mega yacht? One giant mansion? If not “greed” what do you call it?

        • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          the word doesn’t have meaning because the system is morally agnostic.

          The people at the top of it swimming in their Scrooge McDuck piles of money while the rest of us struggle seem pretty fucking greedy to me.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The system isn’t morally agnostic dumbass, it literally is greed. It was created for the purpose of greed and it continues funnel all the wealth to the greedy. Loopholes are found around all the rate limiters and speed governors that get designed into the law and federal agencies. They’re trying “company store” tactics again. Fucking child labor is back.

          “The system is morally agnostic” imagine the fucking Stockholm Syndrome (yes I’ve heard it’s not actually real stfu)

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          there is no such thing as a morally agnostic system, you either agree with or disagree with the outcome of the economic system, it is moral or immoral.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          True, a system whose only imperative is personal upside maximization with no consideration for anybody else is morally agnostic if you put aside the moral dimensions of having no consideration for anybody else whilst acting for personal upside maximization.

          Same as murder being morally agnostic if you put aside the moral dimensions of killing another human being.

          Consider the possibility that you’re confusing familiarity, common use in your environment and even normalization of something with it actually being devoid of a moral component: just because people around you got used to act in some way without questioning such way of acting doesn’t mean it’s morally agnostic: after all, slavery too used to be normal.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          So many people seem to have mistaken what you said for a defense of capitalism.

          I think a better way to say it is that greed isn’t a useful way to explain any particular thing that happens in a capitalist system, because everything that happens in capitalism is driven by greed. Saying one particular problem is caused by greed is like a doctor saying someone’s illness is a symptom of being alive; it’s true, but it explains nothing.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Those are here for the same reason…

      People act like inflation is the invisible hand of the market, this is capitalism, companies will charge whatever they want to maximize profits, and that rarely results in a lower price.

      Like, if you made thingamajigs, and if you made as many as you could (10 million) and sold as much as you could to saturate the market and end up making 10 million, that’s less profit than if you charged $5 a piece and only sold 2 million. Same income, much lower overhead.

      So you cut staffing and make 1/5th of what you can because that maximizes profit.

      Which is fine until your thingamajig is something that people need like food, water, or shelter. If you’re putting profit over production, then people who can’t afford it have to go without.

      It’s literally what’s going on with insulin. This is t a hypothetical, this is what’s been happening for a long time.

      It’s just with the same few giant corporations making everything, if just one does, the other 2-4 giant corporations crunch the same numbers and come up with the same plan.

      Something that used to be called price fixing is suddenly just “internal analytics”

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        So… The Chinese real estate model? Overbuild, saturate the market, and suddenly housing is no longer an issue.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          wait, all we have to do is make more than what the optimal profit supply/demand curve dictates, and we can get rid of homelessness? maybe do the same with food so no one has to starve?

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I could have bought a decent house alone, albeit uncomfortably. But I was happy enough in my condo. Now I have a wife and dual income, and we’d have to really stretch for a shitty house on the outskirts. And neither of our wages have changed much.

  • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The advice in that article is primo out of touch and humorous. They give statistics that people’s savings and assets are down X amount, and the first advice is save for an emergency. Running out of savings?! Just save more, five head.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      10 months ago

      I am reminded of that quote along the lines of “it is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not weakness, that is life.” I did everything right, and had a more than adequate emergency fund.

      But then my house vaporized that emergency fund… and only then did COVID happen and I lost my job twice. So that’s roughly three “holy shit thank god we saved for a rainy day” events in three years.

      I’m sure I will be in “just save money” mode some day in the future. Lots of shit left to clean up right now though.

      • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        10 months ago

        and only then did COVID happen and I lost my job twice. So that’s roughly three “holy shit thank god we saved for a rainy day” events in three years.

        You just explained the last three years of my life. I have no savings left. Period. If anything happens to the car, or either one of us loses our jobs, we’re done. That’s it.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, you aren’t “done”. Life continues.
          Even when the state conspires against you having shelter from weather when you’re homeless. Life still goes on.
          Until it doesnt.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I love that the guy who penned that gold was one of the world’s richest people, and not that long ago called for increasing unemployment, so that the worker learns his place again.

    • Naja Kaouthia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ok, yeah! I’ll just set aside the (checks notes) almost nothing I have left after food, rent, utilities, gas, and my exactly two streaming services.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Mitch McConnell staring off into space - Good thing Americans had those stimulus checks to live off of for the past 30 months.

    • stella@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Speaking of, where did that money come from?

      Did they just print it?

      Weird how when it comes to helping the working class, taxing the rich is never an option. But when it comes to helping the ruling class, you can tax the working class and print money.

  • Cap@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I canceled all our streaming services and Amazon prime. I canceled my phone service and opted for a $15/month plan (Mint). I buy a cheap phone, about $70 bucks. I asked my wife to stop buying me snack foods at the grocery store to save ~$50/week. All told I think we are not spending ~$300/month that I can now put towards our cars that are starting to break down. Someone said something about savings but I only cultivate dust and stones there.

    • stella@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t feel like you have to do without just because you’re smart enough not to subscribe!

      You can stream pretty much anything for free here: https://fmoviesz.to/

      Just make sure you have uBlock Origin installed.

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      if your cars are totaled one day, definetely buy a toyota made around 2000-2015. those things are modern but still indestructible. (but definetely don’t cheap out on maintenance, oil is especially important)

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Especially with the war on work from home that seems to be going on at the moment.

          Can’t you guys just apply to work for European companies remotely wouldn’t that be a workaround? I know my company has a few remote American employees and they’re not totally useless.

          • Patches@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Most companies would rather not perform the hassle of hiring international workers. Taxes are… Complicated. The only reason it makes sense is to save a shit ton of money - see India.

            • wesley@yall.theatl.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The other time would be for high demand skills that they can’t staff locally which only applies to certain industries like tech, etc. Even then it usually only makes sense if they’re getting top quality talent in those industries.

              I consider myself to be a decent software engineer which is fairly in demand (even with recent layoffs imo), but even then I think I’d have a hard time finding a remote European job.

              Oh and let’s not forget that for most engineering positions the salaries are usually lower in European companies. Unless they’d be willing to pay relative to where I live, it would probably mean a pay cut. And I doubt even the benefits would make it worth it given I’d still be living in the US with our private health insurance system, terrible/expensive transportation, etc.

              If it offered relocation then that could make it worth it but that’s probably even more difficult to get hired for and has obvious downsides

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Same. Huge promotion, way more responsibility and stress, annnnnnd I’m just treading water financially.

  • Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not surprising at all.

    Corporations made BANK and all the CEOs put it directly into their pockets.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why stop at their wealth?

      As someone pointed out to me, round them all up. Throw in them into an island penal colony and let them all go Lord of the Flies on each other.

      My suggestion for improvement, was every once awhile, lob some artillery shells at the island. Can’t let those billionaires get comfortable.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The implication being that covid-19 is a field wealth redistribution program?

    • AUniqueGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      It doesn’t make that claim. It’s just that if you were wealthy between 2020 and now you can more easily navigate the price hikes by refinancing during the housing boom, sellings off assets, and shifting investments around.

      But people in lower incomes don’t even have assets/savings to fall back on so they just lose harder when the prices hike.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Actually they are saying that if you were wealthy then you spin that wealth to increase your wealth. Whether that is drastically increasing profits. Using your connections to get free PPP money from the government. Etcetera…

        We did not all lose something during Covid. The richest among us got a lot richer, and they continue to do so.

        We are not in this boat together.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Boats are expensive!

          We’re all pushed into the water that then raises the tide for the rich in those boats…

    • frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think some people, myself included, managed to stay stable, so that’s probably a big chunk of it. I got a new job in June 2020 that was enough of a raise to make up for inflation, so while I’m not ahead of where I was 3 years ago, I was at least in the same mediocre position I started in. That said, I’ve had $3k in dental bills since July because dental insurance is pretty much a scam, soooo I’m now officially fucked, but I was doing ok.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      People like me and my wife. Wife is in healthcare and I am in automation. Wife gets as much overtime as she wants and I got several pay raises as suddenly companies found that they couldn’t depend on just buying the same things forever and ran out of workers.

      Oh don’t worry I am sure the boot is ready to crush us both like a bug. Just ignoring us for the time being.

    • send_me_your_ink@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      So my wife and I are one of them. I’ll call it as it is, we got lucky, and both work in tech.

      Now that said, I “rent” (rent in quotes because the amount is almost exactly what the increase in food costs was) out a room to a good friend because she was struggling, and just last week got another friend couch surfing for who knows how long until she can get her feet under her.

    • CptOblivius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      A lot of us in healthcare stayed pretty stable. I don’t know of any that did “better”, but other than elective stuff, day to day dropped only a little. About 9-10% of Americans are in healthcare. I do know a lot of delivery services did well too.

      • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        And we now have the career experience from working Covid front lines combined with the aftermath of the Great Resignation, making us even more in demand. Yeah, I’m also one of the few doing better financially after Covid than before.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, I currently make more than the average household in my state, solo. So does my gf.

        And we can’t afford shit.

        So, you tell me? I’m in the top 5% of income in my state. I am doing way worse than I was in 2019. E erything cost double and I dont make double.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          What costs double? I track my expenses very closely and have for about a decade and my essentials are up 10% at most, 7% on average. That’s food, transportation, home expenses and cloth. My recreation expenses were actually down or flat.

        • folkrav@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m in a similar situation up here in Canada. Back then I could afford a house at a reasonable distance from town, even at current interest rates and with my significantly lower salary. Now I can maybe look at a small bungalow 1h out or more… if I assume I can keep working remotely indefinitely. Groceries just skyrocketed. Had to move in between, with high interest and low vacancy rates, we had to eat a big rent hike despite us moving way out of town.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          From the article, emphasis added:

          The poorest 40% of households suffered an 8% drop in cash savings and the middle 40% (the U.S. middle class) also saw their bank deposits and other liquid assets topple. Only the wealthiest 20% of households are still enjoying the extra cash they stockpiled during the pandemic, with their savings about 8% above where they were in March 2020.

          I’m not disbelieving your personal experience, but the article does indeed say it’s the top quintile who benefited.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I may be a 1%er in this context. 49 at the start, had just scored a job paying double salary and benefits both (<-worked hard for this bit, for many years), Habitat for Humanity mortgage (no interest or land taxes), all that.

      COVID killed mom (grandma really), got some inheritance, bought a couple of acres of swamp. It’s mine and I play there every weekend. Long story, but the land is a big deal in my life.

      Went nuts buying stuff I always wanted and couldn’t afford before inflation really set in. I wouldn’t/couldn’t buy most of that stuff at these prices.

      And now I’m about to get paid on the last of the inheritance and pay my little house off.

      I know this sort of comment isn’t welcome, but you asked. Dumb luck mostly, and I recognize that.

      And speaking of dumb luck, I’m getting married in 2-weeks to the finest woman I’ve ever met. (OK. I made a LOT of effort, but still, lots of luck as well) Been with a lot of women, so I’ve failed a lot, not this time. She’s gushing to her Filipina friends ATM. I don’t speak Tagalog or I might relate a bit of the conversation, all sounds good though. (Nothing private of course.)

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Spending an extra 8% on groceries just means a bit less to savings? IDK, I kind of feel like the opposite. Economic dooming ahead of an election is as natural as the sunrise, especially when there’s a Democrat in office.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well if your income increased more than inflation you might be fine. For my family this was the case and we have a fixed income mortgage as well so our expenses as a whole have gone up a lot less than inflation. I think this is true for a substantial minority of people.